Hide
Show all
Email this article Cybereducation in Society – Benefits and Threats
Abstract
The author points to an important area of education, as the article refers to cybereducation as an opportunity to acquire, process and share information over the Internet and using computer systems. Cybereducation in society is provided at several levels: family environment, school (academic) environment, professional (workplaces) environment, local government, community organisations, media. The family environment is mainly about teaching children to be sceptical about sharing data online and teaching them how to use a tablet or computer properly. Cybereducation notably includes cyber lessons given by school and university teachers on how to use the Internet safely. Cybereducation also includes services consisting of offering employees a cybersecurity training package. Non-governmental organisations, an essential part of democracy and civil society, play a significant role in cybereducation in society. The media presence used by individuals and entities who are a source of threat to international peace and security is also significant in this regard. The article contains the characteristics of concepts related to cybereducation, describes the threats and benefits to this issue, and contains conclusions for improving the quality of cybereducation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
LITERATURE
Boon S., Sinclair C., A World I Don’t Inhabit: Disquiet and Identity in Second Life and Facebook, “Educational Media International” 2009, vol. 46(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980902933565.
Castells M., Społeczeństwo sieci, Warszawa 2008.
Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz K., Cyberodpowiedzialność, Toruń 2019.
Czuryk M., Activities of the Local Government During a State of Natural Disaster, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2021, vol. 30(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.4.111-124.
Czuryk M., Cybersecurity and Protection of Critical Infrastructure, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2023, vol. 32(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.5.43-52.
Czuryk M., Restrictions on the Exercising of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms Due to Cybersecurity Issues, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2022, vol. 31(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.3.31-43.
Czuryk M., Drabik K., Pieczywok A., Bezpieczeństwo człowieka w procesie zmian społecznych, kulturowych i edukacyjnych, Olsztyn 2018.
Gaie C., Karpiuk M., The Provision of e-Services by Public Administration Bodies and Their Cybersecurity, [in:] Transforming Public Services – Combining Data and Algorithms to Fulfil Citizen’s Expectations, eds. C. Gaie, M. Mehta, Cham 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55575-6.
Gierszewski J., Pieczywok A., Społeczny wymiar bezpieczeństwa człowieka, Warszawa 2018.
Górka M., Od ekshibicjonizmu po teatralizację, czyli o zagrożeniach wynikających z cyberuzależnienia, [in:] Cyberbezpieczeństwo dzieci i młodzieży. Realny i wirtualny problem polityki bezpieczeństwa, ed. M. Górka, Warszawa 2017.
Karpiuk M., Glosa do wyroku Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 12 lutego 2018 r. (II OSK 2524/17), “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2019, vol. 28(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2019.28.1.185-194.
Karpiuk M., Position of the Local Government of Commune Level in the Area of Security and Public Order, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2019, vol. 28(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2019.28.2.27-39.
Karpiuk M., Recognizing an Entity as an Operator of Essential Services and Providing Cybersecurity at the National Level, “Prawo i Więź” 2022, no. 4, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi42.524.
Karpiuk M., The Legal Status of Digital Service Providers in the Sphere of Cybersecurity, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2023, vol. 32(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.189-201.
Karpiuk M., The Provision of Safety in Water Areas: Legal Issues, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2022, vol. 31(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.1.79-92.
Karpiuk M., Kostrubiec J., Provincial Governor as a Body Responsible for Combating State Security Threats, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2024, vol. 33(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.1.107-122.
Karpiuk M., Melchior C., Soler U., Cybersecurity Management in the Public Service Sector, “Prawo i Więź” 2023, no. 4, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi47.751.
Karpiuk M., Włodek T., Wygaśnięcie mandatu wójta na skutek skazania na karę grzywny za niedopełnienie obowiązków z zakresu zarządzania kryzysowego. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Rejonowego w P. z dnia 18 kwietnia 2019 r. (II K 1164/14), “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2020, vol. 29(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.1.273-290.
Kostrubiec J., Preventing the Abuse of the FinTech Sector for Money Laundering and Fiscal Fraud in Terms of Polish Law: Legal Measures and Postulates of Normative Changes, [in:] Digital Transformation of the Financial Industry: Contributions to Finance and Accounting, eds. S. Benković, A. Labus, M. Milosavljević, Cham 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23269-5_11.
Kot D., Dyrektywa Unii Europejskiej o handlu zagranicznym i jej implikacje dla prawa cywilnego, “Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego” 2001, no. 1.
Lang W., Spór o pojęcie odpowiedzialności prawnej, “Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Prawo” 1969, no. 37.
Lou L.L., Yan Z., Nickerson A., McMorris R., An Examination of the Reciprocal Relationship of Loneliness and Facebook Use among First-Year College Students, “Journal of Educational Computing Research” 2012, vol. 46(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.1.e.
McQuail D., Teoria komunikowania masowego, Warszawa 2008.
Notley T.M., Tacchi J.A., Online Youth Networks: Researching the Experiences of ‘Peripheral’ Young People in Using New Media Tools for Creative Participation and Representation, “3CMedia: Journal of Community, Citizen’s and Third Sector Media and Communication” 2005, no. 1.
Nowicka-Kozioł M., Wprowadzenie. Poczucie odpowiedzialności moralnej jako aspekt podmiotowy, Warszawa 2000.
Pieczywok A., Działania społeczne w sferze bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego, Lublin 2018.
Pieczywok A., Idee bezpieczeństwa człowieka w teoriach i badaniach naukowych, Bydgoszcz 2021.
Podrecki P., Prawo Internetu, Warszawa 2006.
Skarżyńska K., Czy media elektroniczne tworzą sztuczny świat?, [in:] Komunikowanie (się) w mediach elektronicznych, eds. M. Filiciak, G. Ptaszek, Warszawa 2009.
Trim P., Upton D., Cyber Security Culture: Counteracting Cyber Threats through Organizational Learning and Training, New York 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315575681.
Trzaskowski T., Społecznościowo! Web 2.0 nowym kierunkiem w edukacji, “Edukacja i Dialog” 2008, no. 4.
Wallace P., Psychologia Internetu, Poznań 2005.
Zdrodowski B. (ed.), Słownik terminów z zakresu bezpieczeństwa narodowego, Warszawa 2008.
LEGAL ACTS
Act of 23 April 1964 – Civil Code (consolidated text, Journal of Laws 2024, item 653).
Act of 6 June 1997 – Penal Code (consolidated text, Journal of Laws 2024, item 17).
Act of 16 July 2004 – Telecommunications Law (consolidated text, Journal of Laws 2024, item 34).
Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures (OJ L 13/12, 19.1.2000).
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (OJ L 178/1, 17.7.2000).
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ L 167/10, 22.6.2001).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.2.299-312
Date of publication: 2024-06-27 10:20:53
Date of submission: 2024-02-21 22:24:35
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrzej Pieczywok
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.