Harmonising Agency Theory and Sustainable Economic Paradigm – Improving Market Efficiency by Smart Regulation

Franjo Mlinarič, Grygorii Kravchenko, Boštjan Brezovnik

Abstract


We examined the intricate dynamics of agency theory within the framework of sustainable economic transition, which is incredibly capital intensive. Recognizing the gravity of sustainable transition, we address the challenges posed by the Second Order Agency Problem (SOAP) and market failures related to public goods. The research explores the subtle shift towards dominant credence goods and services, emphasizing the need for standardized non-financial information fuelling market’s efficiency. The primary aim is to bridge the gap between classical agency theory and modern sustainable economics applications. Our findings introduce an innovative Regulation Curve Model (RCM) presenting a fresh perspective on the cost-benefit dynamics of regulation. This study’s scope is international, with a specific focus on case studies from Poland and Slovenia. Our results from the RCM concept and from the sustainable strategy scoring model offer significant cognitive value for both academic science and practical policymaking. The research holds potential for guiding future sustainable policies and offers insights for nations navigating the complexities of economic transition.


Keywords


agency theory; sustainable economic transition; regulation curve; market

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Akerlof G.A., The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, “Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1970, vol. 84(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431.

Arrow K.J., Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care, “The American Economic Review” 1963, vol. 53(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-26-5-851.

Coase R., The Nature of the Firm: Origin, “Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization” 1988, vol. 4(1).

Cornell B., Damodaran A., Valuing ESG: Doing Good or Sounding Good?, “The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing” 2020, vol. 1(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2020.1.1.076.

Darby M.R., Karni E., Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud, “The Journal of Law and Economics” 1973, vol. 16(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466756.

Eisenhardt K.M., Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review, “The Academy of Management Review” 1989, vol. 14(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258191.

Friedman M., Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago 1962.

Hirsch P., Michaels S., Friedman R., “Dirty Hands” versus “Clean Models”: Is Sociology in Danger of Being Seduced by Economics?, “Theory and Society” 1987, vol. 16(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139485.

Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H., Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, “Journal of Financial Economics” 1976, vol. 3(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.

Mlinarič F., Oplotnik Ž., Brezovnik B., Economic Limits of (De)Regulation in Legal Services Market, “Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics” 2018, vol. 29(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.29.3.19826.

Nelson P., Information and Consumer Behavior, “Journal of Political Economy” 1970, vol. 78(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/259630.

Nordhaus W., Economic Growth and Climate: The Carbon Dioxide Problem, “The American Economic Review” 1977, vol. 67(1).

Perrow C., Reiss A.J., Wilensky H.L., Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, New York 1986.

Smith A., The Wealth of Nations, New York 2000.

Stigler G.J., The Theory of Economic Regulation, “The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Sciences” 1971, vol. 2(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160.

ONLINE SOURCES

Government of the Republic of Slovenia, Slovenian Development Strategy 2030, 7.12.2017, https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MKRR/Strategija-razvoja-Slovenije-2030/Slovenian-Development-Strategy-2030.pdf (access: 15.6.2023).

International Renewable Energy Agency, World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023: 1.5°C Pathway Preview, June 2023, https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Jun/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2023 (access: 24.5.2023).

Ministry of Development of the Republic of Poland, Strategy for Responsible Development for the Period Up to 2020 (Including the Perspective Up to 2030), 2017, https://www.gov.pl/documents/33377/436740/SOR_2017_streszczenie_en.pdf (access: 15.5.2023).

LEGAL ACTS

Commission delegated Regulation of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards C(2023) 5303 final.

Polish Investment Support Act of 10 May 2018 (Journal of Laws 2018, item 1162).

Polish Public-Private Partnership Act of 19 December 2008 (Journal of Laws 2009, no. 19, item 100).

Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198/13, 22.6.2020).

Slovenian Decree on the uniform methodology for the preparation and treatment of investment documentation in the field of public finance, 2006.

Slovenian Public-Private Partnership Act of 23 November 2006.

Slovenian Investment Promotion Act of 12 February 2018.

Slovenian Certain Concession Contracts Act of 13 January 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.1.143-157
Date of publication: 2024-03-28 13:58:02
Date of submission: 2023-09-22 11:14:34


Statistics


Total abstract view - 611
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Franjo Mlinarič, Grygorii Kravchenko, Boštjan Brezovnik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.