Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Towards Pro-enviromental Psychology and Education: Personality Traits and Sociodemographic Correlates of Enviromental Identity and Voluntary Simplicity
Abstract
Introduction: Climate change is one of the greatest threats to humanity today. Environmental identity, referring to the individual definition of self through the prism of human's relationship with nature, and the voluntary simplicity, which refers to the anti-consumer idea of life, are psychological constructs that have been analyzed in terms of personality and sociodemographic correlates in this work.
Research Aim: The aim of this exploratory study is to analyze the relationships between environmental identity, voluntary simplicity and personality traits, as well as to search for sociodemographic correlates of the analyzed constructs mainly in the sample of young Poles. Method: In the study, 218 people, including 156 women (71.6% of the entire sample) and 62 men (28.4%), aged 18 to 63 (M = 25.40; SD = 7.43), completed the Environmental Identity Scale, the Voluntary Simplicity Engagement Scale and the HEXACO–60 Personality Inventory.
Results: The results showed a high positive correlation between environmental identity and voluntary simplicity (r = 0.73) and their weak positive correlations with openness to experience, honesty-humility, conscientiousness, agreeableness and extraversion, as well as no relationships with emotionality and age. Women scored significantly higher on environmental identity and voluntary simplicity. The place of residence, education, marital and employment status, religion and subjective assessment of the material situation were not related to the analyzed constructs, whereas attitudes towards belief in God or higher force were positively associated with them.
Conclusion: The similarity of the analyzed constructs was demonstrated. Personality traits and socio-demographic variables related to them were investigated. The practical implications of the research in promoting voluntary simplicity are discussed. The Polish translation of the Voluntary Simplicity Engagement Scale is presented. It may be used in pro-environmental education among students. Particular attention should be paid to males as a group that is less interested in pro-environmental issues.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Język Polski)References
Albert, M. (2019). Sustainable frugal innovation – The connection between frugal innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117747
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
Blatt, E. (2014). Uncovering students’ environmental identity: An exploration of activities in an environmental science course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(3), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.911139
Boujbel, L., d’Astous, A. (2012). Voluntary simplicity and life satisfaction: Exploring the mediating role of consumption desires: Voluntary simplicity and life satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(6), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1399
Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2018). Religiosity and voluntary simplicity: The mediating role of spiritual well-being. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3305-5
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental Identity: A Conceptual and an Operational Definition. W: S. Clayton i S. Opotow (red.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (s. 45–65). MIT Press.
Clayton, S., Czellar, S., Nartova-Bochaver, S., Skibins, J. C., Salazar, G., Tseng, Y.-C., Irkhin, B., Monge-Rodriguez, F. S. (2021). Cross-cultural validation of a revised environmental identity scale. Sustainability, 13(4), 2387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042387
Clayton, S., Fraser, J., Burgess, C. (2011). The role of zoos in fostering environmental identity. Ecopsychology, 3(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0079
Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001
Druică, E., Vâlsan, C., Puiu, A.-I. (2022). Voluntary simplicity and green buying behavior: An extended framework. Energies, 15(5), 1889. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051889
Elgin, D., Mitchell, A. (1977). Voluntary Simplicity. The Co-Evolution Quarterly, Summer, 5-18. https://duaneelgin.com/voluntary-simplicity-report/
Etzioni, A. (2004). Voluntary simplicity: Characterization, select psychological implications, and societal consequences. W: B. Hodgson (red.), The Invisible Hand and the Common Good (s. 377–405). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10347-0_17
Freed, A., Wong, D. (2019). The relationship between university students' environmental identity, decision-making process, and behavior. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1320705
Gasiul, H. (2020). Psychologia osobowości. Nurty, teorie, koncepcje. Difin.
Huneke, M. E. (2005). The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology and Marketing, 22(7), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20072
Irkhin, B. D. (2020). Who benefits from environmental identity? Studying environmental identity and mental wellbeing in Russia. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 13(3), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0305
Kala, L., Galčanová, L., Pelikán, V. (2017). Narratives and practices of voluntary simplicity in the Czech post-socialist context. Czech Sociological Review, 53(6), 833–856. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2017.53.6.377
Kızılay, E., Tanık Önal, N. (2019). From the environmental identity to the behavior: The status of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.19581
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Larionov, P. (2020). W stronę psychologii środowiskowej: właściwości psychometryczne polskiej wersji Skali tożsamości środowiskowej. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides Et Ratio, 44(4), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.34766/fetr.v44i4.452
Larionow, P., Sołtys, M., Izdebski, P., Mudło-Głagolska, K., Golonka, J., Demski, M., Rosińska, M. (2022). Climate Change Anxiety Assessment: The Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the Climate Anxiety Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 870392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870392
Lee, H. (2019). The effect of anti-consumption lifestyle on consumer’s attitude and purchase intention toward commercial sharing systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(5), 1422–1441. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2018-0218
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C. (2009). The HEXACO personality inventory – revised. A measure of the six major dimensions of personality. Scale Descriptions. https://hexaco.org/scaledescriptions
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Choi, J., Zachariassen, K. (2015). Connectedness to Nature and to Humanity: Their association and personality correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01003
Lewandowska, A., Witczak, J., Giungato, P., Dierks, C., Kurczewski, P., Pawlak-Lemanska, K. (2018). Inclusion of life cycle thinking in a sustainability-oriented consumer’s typology: A proposed methodology and an assessment tool. Sustainability, 10(6), 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061826
Miao, R. E., Cagle, N. L. (2020). The role of gender, race, and ethnicity in environmental identity development in undergraduate student narratives. Environmental Education Research, 26(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1717449
Millburn, J. F., Nicodemus, R. (2021). Love People, Use Things: Because the Opposite Never Works. Celadon Books.
Oleś, P. K. (2016). Wprowadzenie do psychologii osobowości (Wydanie trzecie, nowe – czwarty dodruk). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Osikominu, J., Bocken, N. (2020). A voluntary simplicity lifestyle: Values, adoption, practices and effects. Sustainability, 12(5), 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051903
Otero-López, J. M., Villardefrancos, E. (2013). Five-Factor Model personality traits, materialism, and excessive buying: A mediational analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 767–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.013
Paço, A., Lavrador, T. (2017). Environmental knowledge and attitudes and behaviours towards energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.100
Passafaro, P., Cini, F., Boi, L., D’Angelo, M., Heering, M. S., Luchetti, L., Mancini, A., Martemucci, V.,
Pacella, G., Patrizi, F., Sassu, F., Triolo, M. (2015). The “sustainable tourist”: Values, attitudes, and personality traits. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 15(4), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415576086
Pérez Ibarra, R. E., Tapia-Fonllem, C. O., Fraijo-Sing, B. S., Nieblas Soto, N., Poggio, L. (2020). Psychosocial predispositions towards sustainability and their relationship with environmental identity. Sustainability, 12(17), 7195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177195
Pervin, L. A., John, O. P. (2002). Osobowość: teorie i badania. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I., Seegebarth, B., Klemm, A. (2017). The role of sustainability in profiling voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Business Research, 70, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.07.008
Puech, C., Dougal, J., Deery, C., Waddell, C., Mõttus, R. (2020). Openness Is Related to Proenvironmental Behavior Both Within and Across Families. Environment and Behavior, 52(9), 996–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519853294
Rebouças, R., Soares, A. M. (2021). Voluntary simplicity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(3), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12621
Rich, S. A., Hanna, S., Wright, B. J. (2017). Simply satisfied: The role of psychological need satisfaction in the life satisfaction of voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9718-0
Rich, S. A., Wright, B. J., Bennett, P. C. (2019). Development of the Voluntary Simplicity Engagement Scale: measuring low-consumption lifestyles. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43(2), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9400-5
Skimina, E., Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Szarota, P., Izdebski, P. (2020). Psychometric properties of the
Polish versions of the HEXACO-60 and the HEXACO-100 personality inventories. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2020.98693
Soutter, A. R. B., Bates, T. C., Mõttus, R. (2020). Big Five and HEXACO Personality Traits, Proenvironmental Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 913–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620903019
Tam, K.-P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004
Teeroovengadum, V. (2018). Environmental identity and ecotourism behaviours: Examination of the direct and indirect effects. Tourism Review, 74(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-11-2017-0190
World Economic Forum. (2022). The Global Risks Report 2022 (17. edycja). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2022.pdf
Zavestoski, S. (2002). The social-psychological bases of anticonsumption attitudes. Psychology and Marketing, 19(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10007
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2022.41.4.53-76
Date of publication: 2022-12-28 11:12:47
Date of submission: 2022-09-13 12:36:23
Statistics
Indicators
Copyright (c) 2022 Paweł Larionow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.