Parents and school in the process of education of foster children – the division of responsibility from the perspective of parents. A research report

Urszula Bartnikowska, Katarzyna Ćwirynkało

Abstract


Introduction: Children in a foster family have a difficult life situation. This is a challenge for both foster parents and teachers. Cooperation based on shared commitment and understanding gives the child a chance to gain positive life experiences. The acquired knowledge and skills can be a resource that will allow the child to change the (often negative) pattern of life of the biological family they come from.

Aim of the study: The aim of the study was understanding how foster parents perceive their cooperation with the school their children attend.

Method: The authors applied the interpretive paradigm, the phenomenography method in the study. To collect the data, focus interviews were conducted in three groups of foster parents. In total, 21 parents took part in the study.

Results: Foster parents notice the division of responsibility in the process of educating children brought up in their families. Their role is to select an institution, start cooperation, help the child learn and accompany rehabilitation, inform the school staff about the specificity of the child’s functioning, and be the advocate for the child. The role of the staff side, according to parents, is to implement the recommendations of specialists, cooperate with parents, set adequate requirements for the child, and present a friendly attitude towards the child and the foster family.

Conclusions: Based on the research results, guidelines for the good cooperation of foster parents with the school were formulated. It is important for teachers to understand the specific situation of not only the child (their life experiences, developmental disorders), but also the foster parent, as well as appreciate their commitment to the child. It would be important to create a support system.


Keywords


education, foster children, foster parents’ role, responsibility, teachers’ role

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Barbour, R. (2011). Badania fokusowe. Warszawa: PWN.

Bartnikowska, U., Ćwirynkało, K. (2016). Funkcjonowanie dziecka z niepełnosprawnością w rodzinie adopcyjnej i zastępczej w kontekście wcześniejszego doświadczania krzywdzenia dziecka w opiniach rodziców. W: U. Bartnikowska, A. Żyta, S. Przybyliński (red.). Inkluzja - marginalizacja - wykluczenie a jakość życia osób z niepełnosprawnością. Wyzwania współczesności. (s. 85-100). Olsztyn: UWM.

Bergsund, H.B., Wentzel-Larsen, T., Jacobsen, H. (2020). Parenting stress in long-term foster carers: A longitudinal study. Child & Family Social Work, 25(S1), 53–62. DOI:10.1111/cfs.12713.

Dakil, S.R., Cox, M., Lin, H., Flores, G. (2012). Physical abuse in U.S. children: Risk factors and deficiencies in referrals to support services. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 21(5), 555–569. DOI:10.1080/10926771.2012.680007.

Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (2009). Wprowadzenie. Dziedzina i praktyka badań jakościowych. W: N.K. Denzin Y.S. Lincoln (red.), Metody badań jakościowych, (s. 19-57) t. 1. Warszawa: PWN.

Flick, U. (2010). Projektowanie badania jakościowego. Warszawa: PWN.

Flick, U. (2011). Jakość w badaniach jakościowych. Warszawa: PWN.

Frączek, Z., Lulek, B. (2010). Wybrane problemy pedagogiki rodziny. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.

Geiger, J., Piel, M., Lietz, C., Julien-Chinn, F. (2016). Empathy as an essential foundation to successful foster parenting. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 25(12), 3771-3779. DOI:10.1007/s10826-016-0529-z

Gibbs, G. (2011). Analizowanie danych jakościowych. Warszawa: PWN.

Głodkowska, J. (2017). Dydaktyka specjalna. Od wzorca do interpretacji. Warszawa: PWN.

Goemans, A, van Geel, M, Vedder, P. (2015). Over three decades of longitudinal research on the development of foster children: a meta-analysis. Child Abuse Negl. Apr;42:121-34. DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.02.003.

Goemans, A., Tarren-Sweeney, M., van Geel, M., Vedder, P. (2018). Psychosocial screening and monitoring for children in foster care: Psychometric properties of the Brief Assessment Checklist in a Dutch population study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 23(1), 9–24. DOI:10.1177/1359104517706527

Jacobsen H., Bergsund H.B., Wentzel-Larsen T., Smith L., Moe V. (2020). Foster children are at risk for developing problems in social-emotional functioning: A follow-up study at 8 years of age. Children and Youth Services Review, 108, 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104603

Kolankiewicz, M. (2009). Dzieci pozbawione opieki rodzicielskiej. W: J. Szymańczak (red.), Dzieci z grup ryzyka. Studia BAS, 1(17), 131-158. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych: Warszawa.

Maaskant, A.M., van Rooij F.B., Bos H.M.W., Hermanns J.M.A. (2016). The wellbeing of foster children and their relationship with foster parents and biological parents: a child’s perspective. Journal of Social Work Practice, s. 379-395. DOI: 10.1080/02650533.2015.1092952

Minnis, H., Everett, K., Pelosi, A.J., Dunn, J., Knapp, M. (2006). Children in Foster Care: Mental Health, Service Use and Costs. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(2), 63–70. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-006-0452-8

Morgan, D.L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152.

Paulston, R.G. (1993). Pedagogika porównawcza jako pole nakreślania konceptualnych map teorii paradygmatów. W: Z. Kwieciński, L. Witkowski (red). Spory o edukację. Dylematy i kontrowersje we współczesnych pedagogiach. (s. 25-50). Warszawa-Toruń: IBE, Edytor.

Pomoc społeczna i opieka nad dzieckiem i rodziną w 2019 roku (2020). Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny, https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/warunki-zycia/ubostwo-pomoc-spoleczna/pomoc-spoleczna-i-opieka-nad-dzieckiem-i-rodzina-w-2019-roku,10,11.html, dostęp: 08/03/2021.

Rapley, T. (2010). Analiza konwersacji dyskursu i dokumentów. Warszawa: PWN.

Rosenthal, J.A., Groze, V., Curiel, H. (1990). Race, Social Class and Special-needs Adoption. Social Work, 35(6), 532–539.

Rosenthal, J.A., Groze, V., Aguilar, G.D. (1991). Adoption Outcomes for Children with Handicaps. Child Welfare, 70(6), 623–636.

Shannon, M., McNamara, B.C., DeGrace, A. (2016). How parents still help emerging adults get their homework done: The role of self-regulation as a mediator in the relation between parent-child relationship quality and school engagement. Journal of Adult Development, 23, 36-44. DOI: 10.1007/s10804-015-9219-0

Silver, L.B. (1989). Frequency of Adoption of Children with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(5), 325–328.

Skilbred, D.T., Iversen, A.C., Moldestad, B. (2017). Successful academic achievement among foster children. What did the foster parents do? Child Care in Practice, 23(4), 356-371. DOI:10.1080/13575279.2016.1188764

Stanley, S.G. (2012). Children with disabilities in foster care: the role of the school social worker in the context of special education. Children & Schools, 34(3), 190-192. DOI:10.1093/CS/CDS012

Stańczak, M. (2015). Współpraca środowiska szkolnego i rodzinnego w opinii nauczycieli z małych szkół wiejskich. Forum Oświatowe, 27(2), 131–151.

Tyszka, Z. (1991). Z metodologii badań socjologicznych nad rodziną. Poznań: MEN.

Zajac, L., Dozier, M., Raby, K.L. (2019). Receptive vocabulary development of children placed in foster care and children who remained with birth parents after involvement with child protective services. Child Maltreatment, 24(1), 107–112. DOI: 10.1177/1077559518808224




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2021.40.2.7-21
Date of publication: 2021-07-08 10:34:06
Date of submission: 2021-03-09 19:59:08


Statistics


Total abstract view - 3117
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 865

Indicators





Copyright (c) 2021 Urszula Bartnikowska, Katarzyna Ćwirynkało

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.