The Usable Quality of Information as an Element of the Humanization of Work in the Development of Modern Organizations

Małgorzata Sławińska, Kamil Wróbel, Daria Walkowiak

Abstract


Theoretical background: In the article, the authors discuss research on aspects of the human centric approach to the process of implementing IT devices due to the specificity of human resources. The authors emphasize the importance of the dynamic development of modern information technologies (IT), which is of fundamental importance for the sustainable development of enterprises. The authors indicate the possibility of integrating various company resources, and above all, the phenomenon of creating an environment for the increase in the importance of human resources in the process of business digitization. A special place in this process is occupied by IT, which activate the employee through various forms. The authors present research that captures the above aspect in terms of the systemic assessment of the usability of interaction and communication processes. The scope of the work concerns communication with the use of IT devices used in the implementation of the goal-oriented tasks. The authors identified factors contributing to the development of job humanization through the flexible improvement of IT devices in a task related context.

Purpose of the article: The aim of this article is to present the findings of a study on the impact of usability on the development of the phenomenon of job humanization among positional employees involved in the manufacturing process. Additionally, it discusses the results of in-depth research seeking to answer the question: Do multifunctional information devices, not dedicated to the profile of professional activities, hinder the employee’s work? If not, what are the consequences for job humanization?

Research methods: The objective of the study was achieved through the use of structured interview methodology. Subsequently, in-depth research was conducted.

Main findings: The results obtained indicate a relationship between the usability of information technology devices and the frequency of their use in the workplace. The outcomes of relational interviews highlight the significant importance of sophisticated, multifunctional information tools that enhance employee engagement and their interest in implementing forms of job humanization, such as job enrichment and enlargement, autonomous groups, and flexible work methods. The main conclusion drawn from the research is that high usability quality of information technology devices forms the basis for the organizational improvement process. This occurs bottom-up, through the personal engagement of employees and their openness to multifunctional, intuitive information tools. For organizations, these are favorable conditions for implementing various forms of organizational humanization. However, a question arises about the limits of this phenomenon due to the limited psychophysical capabilities of humans. This topic will be further developed in the subsequent planned research.


Keywords


usability of information; operator; information technologies devices; sustainable development of enterprises; humanization of work

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bednar, P., & Welch, C. (2020). Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: Creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 22, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09921-1

Bitkowska, A., & Kolterman, K. (2021). Process and Project Approach in Contemporary Organizations. https://www.iacis.org/iis/2021/1_iis_2021_236-245.pdf

Burduk, A. (2013). Modelowanie systemów narzędziem oceny stabilności procesów produkcyjnych. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.

Carpanzano, E., Bettoni, A., Julier, S., Costa, J.C., & Oliveira, M. (2018). Connecting humans to the loop of digitized factories’ automation systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Industry 4.0 Model for Advanced Manufacturing: AMP 2018 3 (pp. 180–193). Springer.

Cotta, J., & Breque, M. (2021). Industry 5.0. European Commission.

Dhondt, S., Oeij, P., & Pot, F. (2021). Digital transformation of work: Spillover effects of workplace innovation on social innovation. In J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, & A. Schroder (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Social Innovation (pp. 99–113). Edward Elgar.

Dyduch, W. (2013). Twórcza strategia – przemijająca koncepcja, czy przyszłość zarządzania strategicznego? Prace Naukowe Wałbrzyskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości w Wałbrzychu: Zarządzanie strategiczne: Quo Vadis?, 22(2), 177–195.

Frank, A.G., Dalenogare, L.S., & Ayala, N.F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15–26.

Gazzaneo, L., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2020). Designing smart operator 4.0 for human values: a value sensitive design approach. Procedia – Manufacturing, 42, 219–226.

Guest, D. (2022). Quality of working life. In C. Warhurst, C. Mathieu, & R. Dwyer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Job Quality (pp. 23–40). Oxford University Press.

Hankiewicz, K. (2013). Jakość użytkowa jako cecha determinująca sprawność dokonywania elektronicznych operacji biznesowych. https://tiny.pl/wl2vg

ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Part 11. Guidance on usability.

Kiełtyka, L. (2016). Rola menedżera we współczesnych organizacjach. https://doi.org/10.33141/po.2016.08.01

Kagermann, H., & Wahlster, W. (2022). Ten years of Industry 4.0. In J. Winter (Ed.), Industry 4.0 – the Global Industrial Revolution. Achievements, Obstacles and Research Needs for the Digital Transformation of Industry (pp. 11–20). Licensee MDPI.

Kiss, M. (2022). The right to disconnect. In A Europe Fit for the Digital Age. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/api/stages/report/current/theme/a-europe-fit-for-the-digital-age/file/al-legislative-proposal-to-the-commission-on-the-right-to-disconnect

Mourtzis, D. (2018). Development of skills and competences in manufacturing towards education 4.0: A teaching factory approach. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Industry 4.0 Model for Advanced Manufacturing: AMP 2018 3 (pp. 194–210). Springer.

Nardo, M., Forino, D., & Murino, T. (2020). The evolution of man – machine interaction: The role of human in Industry 4.0 paradigm. Production & Manufacturing Research, 8(1), 20–34.

Pacholski, L., & Kałkowska, J. (2019). Perspektywy zmienności paradygmatów ergonomii i organizacji przemysłowych procesów wytwarzania maszyn. In L. Pacholski, J. Kałkowska, & P. Kiełbasa (Eds.), Ergonomia wobec wyzwań masowości i globalizacji w produkcji (pp. 5–53). Wyd. Politechniki Krakowskiej.

Panetto, H., Iung, B., Ivanov, D., Weichhart, G., & Wang, X. (2019). Challenges for the cyber-physical manufacturing enterprises of the future. Annual Reviews in Control, 47, 200–213.

Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Dumitrescu, R., Kruger, A., & Hompel, M. (Eds.). (2020). Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index, Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies. acatech STUDIE, 64.

Sikorski, M. (2010). Interakcja człowiek – komputer. Wyd. Polsko-Japońskiej Wyższej Szkoły Technik Komputerowych.

Sławińska M. (2012). Niezawodność człowieka w interakcji z procesem przemysłowym. Wyd. Politechniki Poznańskiej.

Sławińska, M. (2019). Ergonomic Engineering of Technological Devices. Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology.

Tan, Q., Tong, Y., Wu, S., & Li, D. (2019). Anthropocentric approach for smart assembly: Integration and collaboration. Journal of Robotics, 2019.

Tarnowski, W. (2004). Modelowanie systemów. Wyd. Uczelniane Politechniki Koszalińskiej.

Trist, E. (1981). The Evolution of Socio-technical Systems. Ontario Ministry of Labour.

Ulewicz, R., & Blaskova, M. (2018). Sustainable Development and Knowledge Management from the Stakeholders’ Point of View. https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-830447a2-a40c-4836-ae12-af70c518d340. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.29

Wieczorek, S. (2005). Podstawy psychologii pracy i ergonomii. TARNOBUS.

Zolotová, I., Papcun, P., Kajáti, E., Miškuf, M., & Mocnej, J. (2020). Smart and cognitive solutions for Operator 4.0: Laboratory H-CPPS case studies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 105471.

Wróbel, K., Hoffmann, T., & Czarnecki, K. (2020). Management of Ergonomic Interventions when Modeling The Technological Processes in The Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 36th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA). 4–5 November 2020, Granada, Spain. Sustainable Economic Development and Advancing Education Excellence in the era of Global Pandemic (pp. 3202–3211).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2024.58.3.163-180
Date of publication: 2024-07-12 06:50:11
Date of submission: 2024-03-19 11:49:34


Statistics


Total abstract view - 243
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Małgorzata Sławińska, Kamil Wróbel, Daria Walkowiak

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.