Changes in Structures of Tax Systems – Similarities and Differences Among OECD Countries

Sławomir Franek, Adam Adamczyk

Abstract


Numerous studies indicate that the structure of taxation is of greater significance for economic growth than the level of fiscalism measured with the tax revenue to GDP ratio. Hence, the aim of the paper is to answer the question whether the tendencies taking place in tax systems of individual countries indeed reflect efforts to apply such economic growth-friendly tax instruments. The subject of the study were OECD member states in the period of 2000–2012. Data clustering method was applied to assess the direction of changes in the tax structures of OECD countries. In the analysis, four parameters characterizing tax systems were used: the ratio of income taxes to GDP, which describes the overall level of tax burden in the examined countries and three parameters characterizing the tax revenue structure of tax systems, i.e. the share of social security contributions in total tax revenue and the share of consumption taxes in total tax revenue.


Keywords


tax systems; fiscal policy; economic growth

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Agell J., Ohlsson H., Thoursie P., Growth Effects of Government Expenditure and Taxation in Rich Countries: a Comment, “European Economic Review” 2006, No. 50(1), DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.11.006.

Barro R., Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries, “Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1991, No. 104.

De Mooij R., Keen M., Fiscal Devaluation and Fiscal Consolidation: the VAT in Troubled Times, “IMF Working Paper” 2012, No. 8.

Easterly W., Rebelo S., Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: an Empirical Investigation, “Journal of Monetary Economics” 1993, No. 32(3).

European Commission, Tax Reforms in EU Member States: Tax Policy Challenges for Economic Growth and Fiscal Sustainability, “European Economy” 2011, No. 5.

European Commission, Tax Reforms in EU Member States: Tax Policy Challenges for Economic Growth and Fiscal Sustainability, “European Economy” 2013, No. 5.

Kneller R., Bleaney M.F., Gemmell N., Fiscal Policy and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries, “Journal of Public Economics” 1999, No. 74.

Lee Y., Gordon R.H., Tax Structure and Economic Growth, “Journal of Public Economics” 2005, No. 89, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.07.002.

Roeger W., Veld J. in’t, Fiscal Stimulus and Exit Strategies in the EU: a Model-Based Analysis, “European Economy Economic Paper” 2010, No. 426.

Ward J.H., Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function, “Journal of the American Statistical Association” 1963, No. 58, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845.

Widmalm F., Tax Structure and Growth: are Some Taxes Better Than Others?, “Public Choice” 2001, No. 107(3/4), DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010340017288.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2016.50.1.51
Date of publication: 2016-04-03 14:40:06
Date of submission: 2015-07-29 18:21:03


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1015
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Sławomir Franek, Adam Adamczyk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.