Hide
Show all
Email this article 
In search of Decision-making Situation (DMS) in International relations: A review of unpacked Paris climate change agreement
Abstract
The Paris Climate Agreement (PCA) of December 2015 marks a decisive point in international relations. The Paris Agreement (PA) established unpacked climate change pledges and policies which offer a significant situation to the international relations decision-making process. Therefore, this paper stands on the Decision-making Situation (DMS) in International relations to inform unpacked Paris climate change agreement.
The approach of this paper to the Decision-making Situation (DMS) embedded in the Paris climate change agreement focuses on review, identifying incentives, Decision-making Situation of the Paris agreement (DMS-PA), and EX- Political steps on the Paris Agreement (EXP-PA) model. The paper briefly assesses specific incentives: Copenhagen, Cancun, Durban, Doha, Warsaw, Lima to track review methods towards DMS related to PA. The review and analysis in this paper lay out a detailed process, techniques, and guidelines for the future framework of DMS in international climate change system (ICCS) analysis.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Badr, H., & Acitelli, L. K., (2005). Dyadic adjustment in chronic illness: Does relationship talk matter? Journal of Family Psychology. 19(3), 465-469. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.465
Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R., (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult lifespan. Psychological Bulletin. 133(6), 920-954.
BC3 PUBLIC POLICY BRIEFINGS. (2011). the Cancun Climate Summit: a Moderate Success. Bilbao, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.bc3research.org/lits_publications.html.
Bracking, S. (2014). The Anti-Politics of Climate Finance: The Creation and Performativity of the Green Climate Fund. Antipode, 47(2), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12123.
COP 15 Copenhagen | Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. (2019). Retrieved 23 October 2019, from https://www.c2es.org/content/cop-15-copenhagen/.
Campbell, D. (2013). After Doha: What Has Climate Change Policy Accomplished? Journal of Environmental Law, 25(1), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqt001.
Cui, L., & Gui, H. (2015). Sharing the burden of financing the green climate fund in the Post-Kyoto era. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 7(2), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-11-2013-0125.
Dimitrov, R. (2010). Inside UN Climate Change Negotiations: The Copenhagen Conference. Review of Policy Research, 27(6), 795-821. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00472.x.
Earth Negotiations Bulletin. (2014). Summary of the Lima Climate Change Conference: 1-14 December 2014. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.ca/climate/cop20/enb/.
Egenhofer, C., & Georgiev, A. (2009). The Copenhagen Accord a first stab at deciphering the implications for the EU. Brussels: CEPS. Retrieved from http://www.ceps.eu/.
Earth Negotiations Bulletin. (2012). Summary of the Doha Climate Change Conference. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.ca/climate/cop18/enb/.
Fridahl, M., & Linnér, B. (2015). Perspectives on the Green Climate Fund: possible compromises on capitalization and balanced allocation. Climate and Development, 8(2), 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1040368.
Hampton, R. (2014). Attendance Report from United Nations Climate Change Conference Warsaw 2013: Conference of the Kyoto Agreement Parties (COP19). Melbourne: Forest & Wood Products Australia Limited.
Hultman, N., & Langley, C. (2013). Climate Change Negotiations in Warsaw Result in a Timeline for Agreement in 2015. The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2013/11/27/climate-change-negotiations-in-warsaw-result.
International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2009). A Brief Analysis of the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference.
Intro to Cancun Agreements | UNFCCC. (2019). Retrieved 18 September 2019, from https://unfccc.int/process/conferences/the-big-picture/milestones/the-cancun agreements.
International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2013).
Summary of the Warsaw Climate Change Conference: 11-23 November 2013. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.ca/climate/cop19/enb/.
Kulovesi, K. (2012). A new chapter in the UN climate change negotiations? First steps under the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Climate Law, 3(2), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1163/cl-2012-062.
Key outcomes of the Lima Climate Change Conference (COP20) | Sustainability for all. (2015). Retrieved 24 June 2015, from https://www.activesustainability.com/opinion/5-key-outcomes-of-the-lima-climate-change-conference-cop20/.
Keohane, R. and Oppenheimer, M., 2016. Paris: Beyond the Climate Dead End through Pledge and Review? Politics and Governance, 4(3), pp.142-151.
Lal Pandey, C. (2014). The limits of climate change agreements: from past to present. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 6(4), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-03-2013-0026.
Marcu, A. (2012). Doha/COP 18: Gateway to a New Climate Change Agreement. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies. Retrieved from http://www.ceps.eu.
Moncel, R. (2012). Unconstructive Ambiguity in the Durban Climate Deal of COP 17 / CMP 7. Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 12(2). Retrieved 26 July 2021, from https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.pl/&httpsredir=1&article=1507&context=sdlp.
Niederberger, A., & Kimble, M. (2011). MRV under the UN climate regime: paper tiger or catalyst for continual improvement? Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, 1(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.3763/ghgmm.2010.0009.
Scott, D., & Becken, S. (2010). Adapting to climate change and climate policy: progress, problems and potentials. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(3), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003668540.
Summary and Analysis of the Durban Climate Change Conference, 28 November - 9 December 2011, Durban, South Africa. (2011). Retrieved 28 November 2011, from http://enb.iisd.org/vol12/enb12534e.html.
Shockley, K., & Boran, I. (2015). COP 20 Lima: The ethical dimension of climate negotiations on the way to Paris–Issues, challenges, prospects. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 18(2), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2015.1076564.
Tschakert, P. (2015). 1.5°C or 2°C: a conduit’s view from the science-policy interface at COP20 in Lima, Peru. Climate Change Responses, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40665-015-0010-z.
The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. 2014. "Alongside the UNFCCC: Complementary Venues for Climate Action". United States: Stockholm Environment Institute.
The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. (2011). Outcomes of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Durban, South Africa.
Further Reading
Hudson, V., 2005. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), pp.1-30.
Heal, G. and Millner, A., 2014. Reflections. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(1), pp.120-137.
Onencan, A. and Van de Walle, B., 2018. From Paris Agreement to Action: Enhancing Climate Change Familiarity and Situation Awareness. Sustainability, 10(6), p.1929.
Maljean-Dubois, S., 2016. The Paris Agreement: A New Step in the Gradual Evolution of Differential Treatment in the Climate Regime?. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25(2), pp.151-160.
Lawrence, M. and Schäfer, S., 2019. Promises and perils of the Paris Agreement. Science, 364(6443), pp.829-830.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/teka.2020.15.2.59-77
Date of publication: 2022-01-09 20:34:37
Date of submission: 2021-12-28 10:04:47
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.