Right to a (Healthy) Environment – How to Come Closer to the Implementation? Good Examples from the Practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court

Gyula Bándi, Ágnes Kovács Tahyné

Abstract


The paper discusses how the right to a healthy environment and the supportive principles could enter into the practice of the Constitutional Court in Hungary over the past 30 years. Beginning with a short survey of the legislative development is presented, following with the discussion of the constitutional interpretation, which commenced with the principle of non-regression, together with the necessity-proportionality test, and the need to give flesh to the bones of constitutional rights – explicitly, institutionalize them – could come parallel with these principles. Later the precautionary approach and the interests of future generations – even a public trust doctrine – could be incorporated in the Court practice. Needless to say, that while the theoretical and constitutional grounds are vital, what really matters are the institutional consequences and practical implementation. Still, if the scene is clear, the subsequent steps might be easier.


Keywords


right to healthy environment; non-derogation/retrogression; precautionary principle; necessity-proportionality test; interests of future generations; Hungarian Constitutional Court

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Bándi G., The Hungarian Ombudsman for Future Generations, “P.A. Persona e Amministrazione: Ricerche Giuridiche sull’Amministrazione e l’Economia” 2022, vol. 9(2).

Brunnée J., Common Areas, Common Heritage, and Common Concern, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, eds. D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée, E. Hey, Oxford 2008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0023.

Engle E., The History of the General Principle of Proportionality: An Overview, “Dartmouth Law Journal” 2012, vol. 10(1).

Gardos-Orosz F., Zakariás K. (eds.), The Main Lines of the Jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court: 30 Case Studies from the 30 years of the Constitutional Court (1990 to 2020), Baden-Baden 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748929826.

Halmai G., The Fundamental Law of Hungary and the European Constitutional Values, “DPCE online” 2019, vol. 39(2).

Halmai G., The Reform of Constitutional Law in Hungary after the Transition, “Legal Studies” 1998, vol. 18(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1998.tb00012.x.

Hörcher F., Lorman T. (eds.), A History of the Hungarian Constitution: Law, Government and Political Culture in Central Europe, London 2018.

Kecskés G., The Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Protection of Groundwater: Decision No. 13/2018. (IX. 4.) AB of the Constitutional Court of Hungary, “Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law” 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/HYIEL/266627012020008001022.

Pánovics A., The Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Protection of Forests: Decision No. 14/2020. (VII. 6.) AB of the Constitutional Court of Hungary, “Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law” 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/HYIEL/266627012021009001021.

Ristroph A., Proportionality as a Principle of Limited Government, “Duke Law Journal” 2005, vol. 55.

Sadeleer N. de, The Principles of Prevention and Precaution in International Law: Two Heads of the Same Coin?, [in:] Research Handbook on International Environmental Law, eds. M. Fitzmaurice, D. Ong, P. Merkouris, Cheltenham 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849807265.00017.

Sulyok K., The Public Trust Doctrine, the Non-Derogation Principle and the Protection of Future Generations: The Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Review of the Forest Act, “Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law” 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/HYIEL/266627012021009001020.

Tushnet M.V., Fleiner T., Saunders C. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law, London 2012, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203072578.

Varga A.Zs., Patyi A., Schanda B. (eds.), The Basic (Fundamental) Law of Hungary: A Commentary of the New Hungarian Constitution, Dublin 2015.

Weiss E.B., In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity, New York 1989.

Weiss E.B., In Fairness to Future Generations and Sustainable Development, “American University International Law Review” 1992, vol. 8(1).

ONLINE SOURCES

Group of Experts, Draft Global Pact for the Environment, https://globalpactenvironment.org/uploads/EN.pdf (access: 10.11.2024).

Parliamentary Assembly, Drafting an Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights Concerning the Right to a Healthy Environment, 11.9.2009, http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=12279〈=en (access: 10.11.2024).

The Holy Father Francis, Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home, https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (access: 10.11.2024).

UNAP, Act II of 1976 on the Protection of the Human Environment, 1976, https://leap.unep.org/countries/hu/national-legislation/act-ii-1976-protection-human-environment (access: 10.11.2024).

UNAP, Environmental Law Guidelines and Principles: Stockholm Declaration, 16.6.1972, https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/29567/ELGP1StockD.pdf (access: 10.11.2024).

UNESCO, Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations Towards Future Generations, 12.11.1997, https://en.unesco.org/about-us/legal-affairs/declaration-responsibilities-present-generations-towards-future-generations (access: 10.11.2024).

United Nations, UN Conference on the Human Environment, 5–16.6.1972, Stockholm, https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972 (access: 10.11.2024).

United Nations, General Assembly, Our Common Agenda Policy Brief 1: To Think and Act for Future Generations, A/77/CRP.1, 7.2.2023, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4004913/files/A_77_CRP.1-EN.pdf (access: 10.11.2024).

United Nations, General Assembly, Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14.6.1992, Annex I: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I), 12.8.1992, https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf (access: 10.11.2024).

United Nations, General Assembly, Right to a Healthy Environment: Good Practices. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment, A/HRC/43/53, 30.12.2019, https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g19/355/14/pdf/g1935514.pdf (access: 10.11.2024).

United Nations, General Assembly, World Charter for Nature, A/RES/37/7, 28.10.1982, https://ejcj.orfaleacenter.ucsb.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/1982.-UN-World-Charter-for-Nature-1982.pdf (access: 10.11.2024).

Wikisource, Constitution of the Republic of Hungary (1989), https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Republic_of_Hungary_(1989) (access: 10.11.2024).

MISCELLANEOUS

UNHCR, Report: General Comment No. 36 (2018) on Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the Right to Life, 30.10.2018.

World Congress on Justice, Governance and Law for Environmental Sustainability, Second Preparatory Meeting, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 23–24 April 2012, Issue Brief no. 3.

LEGAL ACTS

Declaration of the Council of the European Communities and of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting in the Council of 22 November 1973 on the programme of action of the European Communities on the environment (OJ C 112/1, 20.12.1973).

Fundamental Law of Hungary (25 April 2011).

CASE LAW

Decision of the HCC No. 1007/B/1994/12 AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 28/1994 (V. 20.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 27/1995 (V. 15.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 48/1997 (X. 6.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 48/1998 (XI. 23.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 30/2000 (X. 11.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 106/2007 (XII. 20.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 3068/2013 (III. 14.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 13/2013 (VI. 17.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 16/2015 (VI. 5.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 3114/2016 (VI. 10.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 3104/2017 (V. 8.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 3223/2017 (IX. 25.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 28/2017 (X. 25.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 13/2018 (IX. 4.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 17/2018 (X. 10.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 4/2019 (III. 7.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 3196/2020 (VI. 11.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 14/2020 (VII. 6.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 5/2022 (IV. 14.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 8/2022 (V. 25.) AB.

Decision of the HCC No. 16/2022 (VII. 14.) AB.

Judgment of the Court of 14 July 1983, case 174/82, Criminal proceedings v Sandoz BV, ECLI:EU:C:1983:213.

Judgment of the Court of 5 May 1998, case C-157/96, The Queen v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ex parte National Farmers’ Union and Others, ECLI:EU:C:1998:191.

Judgment of the Court 5 May 1998, case C-180/96, United Kingdom v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:1998:192.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2002, case T-13/99, Pfizer Animal Health v Council of the European Union, ECLI:EU:T:2002:209.

Judgment of the Court of 9 September 2003, case C-236/01, Monsanto Agricoltura Italia and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2003:431.

Judgment of the Court of 23 September 2003, case C-192/01, Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Denmark, ECLI:EU:C:2003:492.

Judgment of the Court of 7 September 2004, case C-127/02, Waddenvereniging and Vogelsbeschermingvereniging, ECLI:EU:C:2004:482.

Judgment of the Court of 26 May 2005, case C-132/03, Codacons and Federconsumatori, ECLI:EU:C:2005:310.

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2006, case C-504/04, Agrarproduktion Staebelow, ECLI:EU:C:2006:30.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2008, case T‑75/06, Bayer CropScience AG et al. v Commission of the European Communities, ECLI:EU:T:2008:317.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.4.163-187
Date of publication: 2024-12-23 16:38:36
Date of submission: 2023-05-01 15:45:33


Statistics


Total abstract view - 17
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Gyula Bándi, Ágnes Kovács Tahyné

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.