Hide
Show all
Email this article Lawyers in Post-Transformational Society in Times of Populism: Guardians of the Hegemonic Status Quo or Agents of Social Change?
Abstract
The article discusses the functioning of lawyers in a Central European, post-transformational society. It presents both the narrative created and spread by legal milieu concerning their social role, as well as how legal professions function and are perceived within society. Lawyers often describe themselves as agents of social change and as being actively involved defenders of individual rights. Meanwhile, they are more often perceived as guardians of the status quo, who serve the interests of the hegemonic class. This is illustrated by the situation in Poland after 1989, where such a narrative has prevailed since the very beginning of the transformation, and where problems connected with the actual functioning of legal professions have been accumulating. The gradually growing discrepancy between the narrative of the legal milieu and the social evaluation of their activities made lawyers an easy target for attack from politicians described as populist. The author suggests perceiving lawyers as agents of social change, who follow social expectations, rather than as guardians of post-transformational status quo.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
LITERATURE
Agacka-Indecka J., W Sejmie i Senacie. Sprawozdanie z zakończenia prac parlamentarnych nad zmianą ustawy – Prawo o adwokaturze, “Palestra” 2005, no. 9–10.
Barak A., The Judge in Democracy, Princeton 2006.
Barek-Erez D., Law in Society: A Unifying Power or a Source of Conflict, [in:] Law and Sociology, ed. M. Freeman, Oxford 2006, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282548.003.0010.
Blichner L.C., Molander A., Mapping Juridification, “European Law Journal” 2008, vol. 14(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00405.x.
Bobek M., The Fortress of Judicial Independence and the Mental Transitions of the Central European Judiciaries, “European Public Law” 2008, vol. 14(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2008007.
Cain M., Hunt A., Marx and Engels on Law, London 1989.
Cercel C., Towards Jurisprudence of State Communism: Law and the Failure of Revolution, Abington 2018.
Collins H., Marxism and Law, Oxford 1982.
Croce M., The Politics of Juridification, London 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795720.
Czarnota A., Krygier M., Sadurski W., Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism, Budapest–New York 2005.
Dezalay Y., Madsen M.R., The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the Reflexive Sociology of Law, “Annual Review of Law and Social Science” 2012, vol. 8, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173817.
Dieng A., Role of Judges and the Lawyers in Defending the Rule of Law, “Fordham International Law Journal” 1997, vol. 21(2).
Doorenspleet R., Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratisation, “World Politics” 2000, vol. 52(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100016580.
Douzinas C., Gearey A., Critical Jurisprudence: The Political Philosophy of Justice, Oxford–Portland 2005.
Ely J.H., Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge 1980.
Fleck Z., Judicial Independence and Its Environment in Hungary, [in:] Systems of Justice in Transformation, eds. J. Přibáň, P. Roberts, J. Young, Dartmouth 2003.
Gadowska K., Otwarcie zawodów adwokata i radcy prawnego w Polsce po 1989 roku, “Prakseologia” 2018, no. 160.
Goldstein L.F., From Democracy to Juristocracy, “Law & Society Review” 2004, vol. 38(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00059.x.
Gordon R.W., The Role of Lawyers in Producing the Rule of Law: Some Critical Reflections, “Theoretical Inquiries in Law” 2010, vol. 11(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1247.
Gozdecka D., Europe Changing Approach Towards Blasphemy: The Right Not to Be Offended, Sensitive Identities and Relativism, [in:] Law and Outsiders: Norms, Processes and “Othering” in 21st Century, eds. C. Murphy, P. Green, Oxford–Portland 2011.
Green B.A., The Lawyers Role in Contemporary Democracy, “Fordham Law Review” 2009, vol. 77(4).
Habermas J., Between Facts and Norms – Contributions to a Discursive Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge 1996.
Hardy J., Poland’s New Capitalism, London–New York 2009.
Hirschl R., Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge 2007.
Howarth D., Law as Engineering: Thinking about What Lawyers Do, Cheltenham 2013.
Hunt A., Marxism, Law, Legal Theory and Jurisprudence, [in:] Dangerous Supplements: Resistance and Renewal in Jurisprudence, ed. P. Fitzpatrick, London 1991.
Hunt A., Marxist Theory of Law, [in:] A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. D. Patterson, Chichester 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch22.
Huntington S., Democracy’s Third Wave, “Journal of Democracy” 1991, vol. 2(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0016.
Huntington S., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman 1993.
Ignaczewski J., Wymiar sprawiedliwości – teraźniejszość i przyszłość, Warszawa 2008.
Jewel L., Bourdieu and American Legal Education: How Law School Reproduces Social Stratification and Class Hierarchy, “Buffalo Law Review” 2008, vol. 56(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1138720.
Kaczmarek P., Tożsamość prawnika jako wykonawcy roli zawodowej, Warszawa 2014.
Kennedy D., A Critique of Adjudication (fin de siécle), Cambridge 1997.
Kennedy D., Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy, “Journal of Legal Education” 1982, vol. 32(4).
Kennedy D., The Disenchantment of Logically Formal Legal Rationality: Or Max Weber’s Sociology in the Genealogy of the Contemporary Mode of Western Legal Thought, [in:] Max Weber’s Economy and Society: A Critical Companion, eds. C. Camic, P. Gorski, D. Trubek, Stanford 2005, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503624023-016.
Kennedy D., The Hermeneutic of Suspicion in Contemporary American Legal Thought, “Law and Critique” 2015, vol. 25(1).
Kobyliński K., The Polish Constitutional Court from an Attitudinal and Institutional Perspective Before and After the Constitutional Crisis of 2015–2016, “Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics” 2016, vol. 6(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0006.
Kochanowski J., Jurydyzacja życia, “Palestra” 2002, no. 7–8.
Kojder A., Prawo w impasie, [in:] Polska, ale jaka?, ed. M. Jarosz, Warszawa 2005.
Koncewicz T., The Capture of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and Beyond: Of Institution(s), Fidelities and the Rule of Law in Flux, “Review of Central and East European Law” 2018, vol. 43(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04302002.
Kowalik T., From Solidarity to Sellout: The Restoration of Capitalism in Poland, New York 2012.
Kozak A., Granice prawniczej władzy dyskrecjonalnej, Wrocław 2002.
Kustra A., Poland’s Constitutional Crisis: From Court-Packing Agenda To Denial of Constitutional Court’s Judgments, “Toruńskie Studia Polsko-Włoskie / Studi Polacco-Italiani Di Toruń” 2016, vol. 12.
Kuti C., Post-Communist Restitution and Rule of Law, Budapest–New York 2009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9786155211713.
Kühn Z., The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation?, Leiden–Boston 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047429005.
Lenaerts K., The Court’s Outer and Inner Selves: Exploring the External and Internal Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice, [in:] Judging Europe’s Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice, eds. M. Adams, H. de Waele, J. Meeusen, G. Straetmans, Oxford–Portland 2013.
Lityński A., Historia prawa Polski Ludowej, Warszawa 2013.
Łętowska E., Kilka uwag o praktyce wykładni, “Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego” 2002, vol. 11(1).
Łętowska E., Sobczak K., Rzeźbienie państwa prawa 20 lat później, Warszawa 2012.
Łojko E., Role i zadania prawników w zmieniającym się społeczeństwie, Warszawa 2005.
Maas C. (ed.), Juridification in Europe: The Balance of Powers under Pressure?, The Hague 2012.
Magnussen A.M., Banasiak A., Juridification: Disrupting the Relationship between Law and Politics, “European Law Journal” 2013, vol. 19(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12026.
Mańko R., Law, Politics and the Economy in Poland’s Post-Socialist Transformation: Preliminary Notes Towards an Investigation, [in:] Central and Eastern European Socio-Political and Legal Transition Revisited, eds. B. Fekete, F. Gárdos-Orosz, Bern 2017.
Mańko R., Orzekanie w polu polityczności, “Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna” 2018, vol. 7(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2018.7.1.4.
Mańko R., W stronę krytycznej filozofii orzekania. Polityczność, etyka, legitymizacja, Łódź 2018.
Mańko R., Weeds in the Gardens of Justice? The Survival of Hyperpositivism in Polish Legal Culture as a Symptom/Sinthome, “Pólemos” 2013, vol. 7(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pol-2013-0011.
Mańko R., Škop M., Štěpáníková M., Carving out Central Europe as a Space of Legal Culture: A Way Out of Peripherality?, “Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics” 2016, vol. 6(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0002.
Matczak M., Summa iniuria. O błędzie formalizmu w stosowaniu prawa, Warszawa 2007.
McManaman L.J., Social Engineering: The Legal Philosophy of Roscoe Pound, “St. John’s Law Review” 1958, vol. 33(1).
Milej T., Europejska kultura prawna a kraje Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej, “Przegląd Legislacyjny” 2008, vol. 5(1).
Nizioł K., Deregulacja zawodów prawniczych i jej wpływ na konkurencję na rynku usług prawniczych, “Acta Iuridica Stetinensis” 2018, no. 3, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/ais.2018.23-09.
Piotrowski R., Sędziowie i granice władzy demokratycznej w świetle Konstytucji RP, “Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2018, vol. 80(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2018.80.1.17.
Pound R., The Lawyer as a Social Engineer, “Journal of Public Law” 1954, vol. 3.
Przeworski A., Alvarez M.E., Cheibub J.A., Limongi F., Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990, New York 2000, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804946.
Raburski T., Profesjonalizm i ekskluzywizm prawników w społeczeństwach liberalno-demokratycznych, “Filo-Sofija” 2017, no. 37.
Redzik A., Kotliński T., Historia adwokatury, Warszawa 2018.
Roznai Y., Revolutionary Lawyering? On Lawyers’ Social Responsibilities and Roles During a Democratic Revolution, “Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal” 2013, vol. 22(2).
Sadurski W., Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown, Oxford 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.0001.
Safjan M., Rola prawnika w społeczeństwie, Lublin 2003.
Safjan M., Wyzwania dla państwa prawa, Warszawa 2007.
Sarkowicz R., Poziomowa interpretacja tekstu prawnego, Kraków 1995.
Scalia A., Mullahs of the West: Judges as Moral Arbiters, Warszawa 2009.
Shamir R., Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in New Deal, Durham–London 1995.
Sheingold S.A., The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Changes, Ann Arbor 2004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6766.
Silverstein G., Law’s Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics, New York 2009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809934.
Sitek B., Rynek pracy prawników w Polsce po deregulacji zawodów prawniczych (adwokata i radcy prawnego), “Studia Prawnoustrojowe” 2016, no. 32.
Skuczyński P., Status etyki prawniczej, Warszawa 2010.
Srokosz J., A Technicistic Perspective and Contemporary Perception of the Role of the Lawyers in Society in Poland, [in:] Law and Critique in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present, eds. R. Mańko, C. Cercel, A. Sulikowski, London 2016.
Srokosz J., Arguments for Separate Identity and Particular Importance of Lawyers in Contemporary Society in Narrative of Legal Professions, [in:] Law, Space, and the Political: An East-West Perspective, eds. P. Bieś-Srokosz, R. Mańko, J. Srokosz, Częstochowa 2019.
Staughton C., Za dużo prawa, “Ius et Lex” 2002, no. 1.
Stawecki T., Niezależność zawodów prawniczych i rządy prawa w społeczeństwie postkomunistycznym, [in:] Niezależność sądownictwa i zawodów prawniczych jako fundamenty państwa prawa. Wyzwania współczesności, eds. T. Wardyński, M. Niziołek, Warszawa 2009.
Sulikowski A., Government of Judges and Neoliberal Ideology: The Polish Case, [in:] Law and Critique in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present, eds. R. Mańko, C. Cercel, A. Sulikowski, London 2016.
Sulikowski A., Konstytucjonalizm a nowoczesność. Dyskurs konstytucyjny wobec tryumfu i kryzysu moderny, Wrocław 2012.
Sulikowski A., Posthumanizm a prawoznawstwo, Opole 2013.
Sulikowski A., Trybunał Konstytucyjny a polityczność. O konsekwencjach upadku pewnego mitu, “Państwo i Prawo” 2016, no. 4.
Sulikowski A., Współczesny paradygmat sądownictwa konstytucyjnego wobec kryzysu nowoczesności, Wrocław 2008.
Sulikowski A., Mańko R., Łakomy J., Polityczność prawa i ogólnej refleksji nad prawem: zagadnienia ogólne, “Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” 2018, vol. 3.
Teubner G., Juridification – Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions, [in:] Juridification of Social Spheres: A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labour, Corporate Antitrust and Social Welfare Law, ed. G. Teubner, Berlin–Boston 1987.
Trägårdh L., Delli-Carpini M.X., The Juridification of Politics in the United States and Europe: Historical Roots, Contemporary Debates and Future Prospects, [in:] After National Democracy Rights, Law and Power in America and the New Europe, ed. L. Trägårdh, Portland 2004.
Trubek D., Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism, “Wisconsin Law Review” 1972, vol. 3.
Turska A. (ed.), Humanizacja zawodów prawniczych a nauczanie akademickie, Warszawa 2002.
Weber M., Economy and Society, Berkeley–Los Angeles 1968.
Wenclik M. (ed.), Deregulacja zawodów w Polsce, Łomża 2015.
Zacharias F.C., The Lawyer’s Role in Contemporary Democracy, Promoting Social Changes and Political Values: True Confessions about the Role of The Lawyers in a Democracy, “Fordham Law Review” 2009, vol. 77(4).
Zajadło J., Pojęcie „imposybilizm prawny” a polityczność prawa i prawoznawstwa, “Państwo i Prawo” 2017, no. 3.
Zirk-Sadowski M., Prawo a uczestniczenie w kulturze, Łódź 1998.
Zirk-Sadowski M., Uczestniczenie prawników w kulturze, “Państwo i Prawo” 2002, no. 9.
ONLINE SOURCES
Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, Społeczne oceny wymiaru sprawiedliwości, 2017, https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2017/K_031_17.PDF (access: 27.3.2025).
Kociołowicz-Wiśniewska B., Pilitowski B., Ocena polskiego sądownictwa w świetle badań, 2017, https://courtwatch.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Raport-Fundacji-Court-Watch-Polska-Ocena-polskich-sądów-w-świetle-badań-maj-2017.pdf (access: 27.3.2025).
Łętowska E., Prof. Ewa Łętowska punktuje sędziów, którzy sądzą bez zrozumienia, 29.8.2014, https://prawo.gazetaprawna.pl/artykuly/818520,prof-ewa-letowska-punktuje-sedziow-ktorzy-sadza-bez-zrozumienia.html (access: 27.3.2025).
Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich, Wyroki Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, które wpłynęły na życie obywateli, 16.12.2015, https://www.rpo.gov.pl/pl/content/wyroki-trybunalu-konstytucyjnego-ktore-wplynely-na-zycie-obywateli (access: 27.3.2025).
Stambulski M., Zomerski W., Nużący rytuał. Aplikacja adwokacka i radcowska w Polsce, Wrocław 2019, http://www.bibliotekacyfrowa.pl/dlibra/publication/101947/edition/94782/content?ref=desc (access: 27.3.2025).
LEGAL ACTS
Act of 26 May 1982 – Law on the Bar (consolidated text, Journal of Laws 2022, item 1184, as amended).
Act of 6 July 1982 on legal advisors (consolidated text, Journal of Laws 2022, item 1166, as amended).
Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 (Journal of Laws 1997, no. 78, item 483, as amended).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2025.34.1.283-304
Date of publication: 2025-05-23 14:03:21
Date of submission: 2023-08-08 01:25:26
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jacek Srokosz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.