State Aid as a Risk in the Policy of Competitive Advantages in the European Union

Ildikó Bartha, Tamás M. Horváth

Abstract


Compatibility of economic advantages with the internal market refers to the economic impact of state aid that is permitted by EU competition rules. In general, this approach is based on the acceptance of derogations from basic obligations in a market economy, that may also be granted by the European Union to its Member States. Due advantages seem compatible with EU law per se, however, such compatibility also depends on the discretion of the competent administrative and judicial bodies. According to the analytical and empirical legal policy investigation presented in this article, the activity of the Court of Justice of the European Union is increasing in order to allow exceptions from general rules and extend the scope of compatibility in this field. This process may lead to enhance derogations from market-based commitments in Member States, typically in certain Central and Eastern European countries, which tend to emphasize the primacy of national regulation and are keen to exploit the potential of such broader regulatory autonomy. The aim of the study is to identify the origin and nature of this risk in order to support efforts that may diminish harmful effects in an EU-wide context. The empirical evidence of the paper derives from a systematically selected set of case law as a context by which the examined policy orientation is mirrored.

Keywords


internal market; EU competition rules; state aid; due advantage

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Bartha I., Horváth T.M., Does Not It Matter? Widening of Derogation for Services of General Interests, “Maastricht Journal of Comparative Law” 2020, vol. 27(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19890211.

Bovis C., The Nature and Character of the Public Markets and Their Effects on Public Procurement in the European Union, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2022, vol. 31(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.4.9-27.

Bruzzone G., Boccaccio M., Infrastructures and SGEI: The Scope of State Aid Control and Its Impact on National Policies, [in:] EU State Aid Law: Emerging Trends at the National and EU Level, eds. P. Parrcu, G. Monti, M. Botta, Cheltenham 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975254.00010.

Cavasola P., Ciminelli M., Italy, [in:] Gas Regulation in 32 Jurisdictions Worldwide: Getting the Deal Through, eds. F.F. Ninane, A. Ancel, L. Eskenazi, London 2021.

Cecco F. de, State Aid and the European Economic Constitution, Oxford 2013.

Colomo P.I., Will Article 106 TFEU Case Law Transform EU Competition Law?, “Journal of European Competition Law and Practice” 2022, vol. 13(6).

Haas J.S., D’Erman V.J., Schulz D.F., Verdun A., Economic and Fiscal Policy Coordination After the Crisis: Is the European Semester Promoting More or Less State Intervention?, “Journal of European Integration” 2020, vol. 42(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1730356.

Hancher L., Larouche P., The Coming of Age of EU Regulation of Network Industries and Services of General Economic Interest, [in:] The Evolution of EU Law, eds. P. Craig, G. Búrca, Oxford 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628573.

Lowe P., State Aid Policy in the Policy of the Financial Crisis, “Competition Policy Newsletter” 2011, vol. 16(3).

López J.J.P., The Concept of State Aid under EU Law: From Internal Market to Competition and Beyond, Oxford 2015.

OECD, The Size and Sectoral Distribution of State-Owned Enterprises, Paris 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264280663-en.

Prosser T., The Limits of Competition Law: Markets and Public Services, Oxford 2005, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266692.001.0001.

Rosanò A., Adapting to Change: COVID-19 as a Factor Shaping EU State Aid Law, “European Papers: Journal on Law and Integration” 2020, vol. 5(1).

Rygh B., Governmental Goals and the International Strategies of State-Owned Multinational Enterprises: A Conceptual Discussion, “Journal of Management and Governance” 2022, vol. 26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09595-5.

Sauter W., Public Services in EU Law, Cambridge 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588844.

Varju M, Papp M., The Crisis, National Economic Particularism and EU Law: What Can We Learn from the Hungarian Case?, “Common Market Law Review” 2016, vol. 53(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2016145.

Werner B., National Responses to the European Court of Justice Case Law on Golden Shares: The Role of Protective Equivalents, “Journal of European Public Policy” 2017, vol. 24(7), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1184295.

Zhu L., Services of General Economic Interest in EU Competition Law: Striking a Balance between Non-Economic Values and Market Competition, Heidelberg 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-387-0.

ONLINE SOURCES

European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, ACER-CEER Market Monitoring Report (MMR) 2019, vol. 3: Energy Retail and Consumer Protection, 26.10.2020, https://www.acer.europa.eu/en/Electricity/Market%20monitoring/Pages/Current-edition.aspx (access: 8.5.2023).

LEGAL ACTS

Communication from the Commission – Temporary Community framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis (OJ C 16/1, 22.1.2009).

Communication from the Commission – Temporary Framework for State aid measures to support the economy in the current COVID-19 outbreak (OJ C 91I/1, 20.3.2020).

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2022 Rule of Law Report – The rule of law situation in the European Union, COM/2022/500 final.

Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94/65, 28.3.2014).

Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94/243, 28.3.2014).

CASE LAW

Judgment of the ECJ of 22 November 2001, case C-53/00, Ferring, ECLI:EU:C:2001:627.

Judgment of the ECJ of 24 July 2003, case C-280/00, Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.

Judgment of the ECJ of 20 April 2010, case C-265/08, Federutility and others, ECLI:EU:C:2010:205.

Judgment of the ECJ of 3 March 2011, case C-437/09, AG2R Prévoyance v Beaudout Père et Fils SARL, ECLI:EU:C:2011:112.

Judgment of the ECJ of 11 September 2012, case T-565/08, Corsica Ferries, ECLI:EU:T:2012:415.

Judgment of the ECJ of 22 October 2013, joined cases C-105/12 to C-107/12, Essent and others, ECLI:EU:C:2013:677.

Judgment of the ECJ of 22 October 2015, case C-185/14, EasyPay, ECLI:EU:C:2015:716.

Judgment of the ECJ of 7 September 2016, case C-121/15, ANODE v Premier ministre and others, ECLI:EU:C:2016:637.

Judgment of the ECJ of 5 October 2017, case C-567/15, “LitSpecMet” UAB, ECLI:EU:C:2017:736.

Judgment of the ECJ of 7 November 2018, case C-171/17, Commission v Hungary, ECLI:EU:C:2018:881.

Judgment of the ECJ of 21 March 2019, joined cases C-266/17 and C-267/17, Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker and BVR Busverkehr Rheinland, ECLI:EU:C:2018:723.

Judgment of the ECJ of 3 October 2019, case C-285/18, Irgita, ECLI:EU:C:2019:829.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.35-55
Date of publication: 2023-06-27 10:36:36
Date of submission: 2023-04-13 14:55:53


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1065
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ildikó Bartha, Tamás M. Horváth

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.