The Memoirs of Cola Nicea: A Case-Study on the Discursive Identity Construction of the Aromanian Armatoles in Early 20th Century Macedonia

Vladimir Cretulescu

Abstract


The article begins with a general presentation of Cola Nicea’s Memoirs – the document which is to be investigated using methods drawn from Critical Discource Analysis. The paper continues with a study of the ethnonyms used by Nicea throughout his account, which leads into a discussion of Macedonian Slav and Macedonian Aromanian identities at the turn of the 20th century. Then it discusses the forms of – and reasons for – cooperation between the Aromanian armatoles and TMORO comitadji, as reflected in Nicea’s text. The information contained in this source-material proves that, philoromanian discourse proving ill-equipped to deal with the radicalization of the Macedonian crisis, Romanophile Aromanians adapt by creatively combining the latter discourse with the TMORO political agenda. Finally, the paper refers to the diverse textual and meta-textual devices which come into play in Cola Nicea’s iteration of the Aromanian armatole subject position.


Keywords


identity, discourse, subject position

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin J. L., How to Do Things with Words, Oxford 1971.

Bérard V., La révolution turque, Paris 1909.

Bérard V., Pro Macedonia, Paris 1904.

Castellan G., Histoire des Balkans XIVe–XXe siècle, Fayard 1991.

Cazacu M., Vlahii din Balcanii Occidentali (Serbia, Croaţia, Albania, etc.) Pax Ottomanica (secolele al XV-lea–al XVII-lea), in: Aromânii: istorie, limbă, destin, ed. N. Djuvara, Bucureşti 2012.

Dakin D., The Greek Struggle in Macedonia 1897–1913, Thessaloniki 1966.

Fairclough N., Critical discourse analysis, in: The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. J. P. Gee, M. Handford, London and New York 2012.

Fairclough N., Language and Power, Second Edition, London, New York 2001.

Howarth D., Stavrakakis Y., Introducing discourse theory and political analysis in: Discourse theory and political analysis: identities, hegemonies and social change, ed. D. Howarth, A. J. Norval, Y. Stavrakakis, Manchester and New York 2000.

Jelavich B., Istoria Balcanilor, vol. 2, Iaşi 2000.

Katardžiev I., Nekoi prašanja za ustavíte i pravilnicite na VMRO do Ilindenskoto vostanie, “Glasnik ná Institutot za nacionálna istorija” 1961, 1.

Marinov T., We, the Macedonians : The Paths of Macedonian Supra-Nationalism (1878–1912) in: We, the People : Politics of National Peculiarity in Southeastern Europe, ed. D. Mishkova, Budapest 2009, http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/getdocument.aspxlogid=5&id=5db4b51192bd4f7a85e7699046929d54 [accessed on: 13 November 2015].

Nicea C., Memorii [Memoirs], document originally published in: Scara – Revistă de oceanografie ortodoxă, Bucureşti: Treapta 7, 2001. Digitized by Predania Publishing House, http://www.proiectavdhela.ro/pdf/cola_nicea_memoriile.pdf [accessed on: 12 November 2015].

Nistor I., “Problema aromână” în raporturile României cu statele balcanice (1903–1913) Iaşi 2009.

Peyfuss M. D., Aromânii în era naţionalismelor balcanice in: Aromânii: istorie, limbă, destin ed. N. Djuvara, Bucureşti 2012.

Sériot P., Ethnos et demos: la construction discursive de l’identité collective [English Translation] “Langage et société” 1997, 79. Analyse discursive et engagement : autour de l’Europe de l’Est.

Trifon N., Les Aroumains, un peuople qui s’en va, La Bussière 2005.

Ţovaru S., Problema şcoalelor româneşti din Balcani, Bucureşti 1934.

Widdowson, H. G. Discourse Analysis, Oxford 2007.

Wodak R., The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual, Palgrave Macmillan 2011.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/rh.2016.41.125
Date of publication: 2016-09-29 09:33:16
Date of submission: 2016-09-26 12:30:12


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1155
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 716

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.