Hide
Show all
Email this article Enchant the World Again. Marguerite Yourcenar and the Return to the Order of Being
Abstract
This article aims to describe Marguerite Yourcenar’s intellectual attitude within the post constructivist approach to the problem of knowledge. The writer recognizes the need to rethink how we understand the knowledge production process. She is well aware of the implications of epistemocentrism such as postmodern epistemological relativism and the removal of the ethical dimension of our relationship with all that exists. The author attempts to overcome them in the name of the interdependence of all existences.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Français (France))References
Bots, W. J. A. (1995). L’Histoire : prétexte au roman yourcenarien de l’universel. In S. Delcroix, & M. Delcroix (Eds.), Roman, histoire et mythe dans l’œuvre de Marguerite Yourcenar. Actes du Colloque tenu à l’université d’Anvers du 15 au 18 mai 1990 (pp. 71–79). SIEY.
Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network : The case of the electric vehicle. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology (pp. 19–34). Macmillan Press.
Chehab, M. (2008). L’effet, c’est moi : Marguerite Yourcenar lectrice de Nietzsche. Relief – Revue électronique de littérature française, 2(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.18352/relief.198
Fayet, A. (2007). Marguerite Yourcenar et la non-violence : un combat littéraire d’avant-garde. In B. Blanckeman (Ed.), Les diagonales du temps : Marguerite Yourcenar à Cerisy (pp. 81–96). Presses universitaires de Rennes.
Latour, B. (1986). The power of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196–223). Routledge & Kegan-Paul.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Sytems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.
Mitterer, J. (2008). (Radical) constructivism – what difference does it make? Constructivist Foundations, 3(3), 160–162.
Nowak, A. W. (2016). Wyobraźnia ontologiczna. Filozoficzna (re)konstrukcja fronetycznych nauk społecznych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Nycz, R. (2002). Kulturowa natura, słaby profesjonalizm. Kilka uwag o przedmiocie poznania literackiego i statusie dyskursu literaturoznawczego. In M. P. Markowski, & R. Nycz (Eds.) Kulturowa teoria literatury. Główne pojęcia i problemy (pp. 5–38). UNIVERSITAS.
Nycz, R. (2006). Literatura nowoczesna wobec doświadczenia. Teksty Drugie, 6, 55–69.
Orfila, T. (2005). Le Réenchantement du monde dans la poésie de Marguerite Yourcenar. Revue Internationale des Littératures de l’Union Européenne, 2, 79–86.
Poignault, R. (1995). L’Antiquité dans l’œuvre de Marguerite Yourcenar. Littérature, mythe et histoire. Collection Latomus.
Siemek, M. (2012). Wykłady z filozofii nowoczesności. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Schloßerger, M. (2020). Beyond Empathy: Compassion and the Reality of Others. Topoi, 39, 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09636-7
Vago, D. (2019). Yourcenar, Flaubert, ou l’empathie par la prose. In R. Poignault (Ed.), Marguerite Yourcenar et le Monde de Lettres (pp. 389–401). SIEY.
Weber, M. (1964). L'Éthique protestante et l'esprit du capitalisme. Suivi d’un essai. Librairie Plon.
Yourcenar, M. (1972). Patrick de Rosbo. Entretiens radiophoniques avec Marguerite Yourcenar. Mercure de France.
Yourcenar, M. (1980). Les Yeux ouverts. Entretiens avec Matthieu Galey. Le Livre de poche.
Yourcenar, M. (1991). Mémoires d’Hadrien. In M. Yourcenar, Œuvres romanesques (pp. 285‒555). Gallimard. (Original work published 1951)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2025.49.1.9-18
Date of publication: 2025-04-01 12:28:29
Date of submission: 2023-11-30 21:03:20
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Agnieszka Zwarycz-Łazicka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.