Paradoks represji
Streszczenie w języku polskim
Celem artykułu jest analiza zjawiska określanego w literaturze przedmiotu jako „paradoks represji”, „backfire” lub „polityczne ju-jitsu”. W pierwszej kolejności dokonano wyjaśnienia jego istoty oraz znaczenia dla przebiegu konfliktu asymetrycznego. Następnie przedstawiono historię refleksji naukowej nad paradoksem represji. Prezentacja różnych form kontroli społecznej była punktem wyjścia do analizy sposobu zarządzania represjami przez uczestników konfliktu. Władze starają się zastosować szereg technik powstrzymania oburzenia, zaś aktywiści ruchu kontestacyjnego mogą uruchomić kontr-techniki, zwłaszcza jeśli dysponują wiedzą z zakresu strategicznej walki bez przemocy oraz alternatywnymi źródłami komunikacji. Autor argumentuje, że paradoks represji nie jest prostą konsekwencją stosowania brutalnych represji wobec słabszego przeciwnika, ale zależy w dużym stopniu od polityki komunikacyjnej obu stron konfliktu.
Słowa kluczowe
Pełny tekst:
PDFBibliografia
Arreguín-Toft, I. (2001). How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict. International Security, 26(1), 93-128. doi:10.1162/016228801753212868
Arreguín-Toft, I. (2005). How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ash, T. G. (2009). A Century of Civil Resistance: Some Lessons and Questions. W: A. Roberts, T. G. Ash (red.), Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-violent Action From Gandhi to the Present (s. 371-390). New York: Oxford University Press.
Barany, Z. (2011). The Role of The Military. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 28-39. doi:10.1353/jod.2011.0069
Barany, Z. (2016). How Armies Respond to Revolutions and Why. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400880997
Boulding, K. E. (1999). Nonviolence and Power in the Twentieth Century. W: S. Zunes, L. R. Kurtz, S. B. Asher (red.), Nonviolent social movements: a geographical perspective (s. 9-17). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Carter, A. (2009). People Power and Protest: The Literature on Civil Resistance in Historical Context. W: T. G. Ash, A. Roberts (red.), Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-violent Action from Gandhi to the Present (s. 25-42). New York: Oxford University Press.
Chenoweth, E., Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chodak, J. (2015). Walka bez przemocy w strategii ruchów rewolucyjnych na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. W: J. Wach, Ł. Janicki (red.), Opór - Protest - Wykroczenie (s. 101-111). Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
Davenport, C. (1995). Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression: An inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. American Journal of Political Science, 683-713. doi:10.2307/2111650
Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and the domestic democratic peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davenport, C., Johnston, H., Mueller, C. M. (red.). (2005). Repression and Mobilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, Tear Gas, and Taxes: Toward a Theory of Movement Repression. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 44-68.
Fernandez, L. (2009). Policing Dissent: Social Control and the Anti-Globalization Movement. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Ferree, M. M. (2005). Soft Repression: Ridicule, Stigma, and Silencing in Gender-Based Movements. W: Davenport, Christian, Johnston, Hank, C. M. Mueller (red.), Repression and Mobilization (s. 138-155). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Giugni, M. (2009). Political Opportunities: From Tilly to Tilly. Swiss Political Science Review, 15(2), 361-367. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00136.x
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Gray, T., Martin, B. (2007). Backfires: white, black and grey. Journal of Information Warfare, 7(1), 7-16.
Gregg, R. (1960). The Power of Nonviolence (2nd revised ed.). London: James Clarke & Co.
Hallward, M. C., Norman, J. M. (2015). Understanding Nonviolence. W: M. C. Hallward, J. M. Norman (red.), Understanding nonviolence : contours and contexts (s. 14-35). Malden, MA: Polity.
Hess, D., Martin, B. (2006). Repression, Backfire, and the Theory of Transformative Events. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 11(2), 249-267.
Jansen, S. C., Martin, B. (2003). Making censorship backfire. Counterpoise, 7(3), 5-15.
Kurtz, L. R., Smithey, L. A. (red.). (2018). The Paradox of Repression and Nonviolent Movements (First edition. ed.). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Lazari-Pawłowska, I. (1967). Gandhi. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Lazari-Pawłowska, I. (1990). Etyczne aspekty obywatelskiego sprzeciwu. Etyka, 25, 139-172.
Martin, B. (2004). Iraq attack backfire. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(16), 1577-1583.
Martin, B. (2005a). How nonviolence works. Borderlands e-journal, 4(3).
Martin, B. (2005b). The beating of Rodney King: the dynamics of backfire. Critical Criminology, 13(3), 307-326. doi:10.1007/s10612-005-3186-x
Martin, B. (2015). From Political Jiu-jitsu to the Backfire Dynamic: How Repression Can Promote Mobilization. W: K. Schock (red.), Civil resistance: comparative perspectives on nonviolent struggle (s. 145-167). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Martin, B., Murray, I. (2005). The Parkin backfire. Social Alternatives, 24(3), 46-49.
Martin, B., Varney, W., Vickers, A. (2001). Political Jiu-Jitsu against Indonesian Repression: Studying Lower-Profile Nonviolent Resistance. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, 13(2), 143-156. doi:10.1080/13239100121905
McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. G., Tilly, C. (2004). Dynamics of Contention (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McAuley, J. W., McGlynn, C., Tonge, J. (2008). Conflict resolution in asymmetric and symmetric situations: Northern Ireland as a case study. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 1(1), 88-102. doi:10.1080/17467580802284712
McDonald, P., Graham, T., Martin, B. (2010). Outrage Management in Cases of Sexual Harassment as Revealed in Judicial Decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 165-180. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01559.x
Meyer, D. S., Minkoff, D. C. (2004). Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces, 82(4), 1457-1492. doi:10.1353/sof.2004.0082
Mitchell, C. R. (1991). Classifying Conflicts: Asymmetry and Resolution. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 518(1), 23-38. doi:10.1177/0002716291518001003
Nepstad, S. E. (2011). Nonviolent Revolutions: Civil Resistance in the Late 20th Century. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Nepstad, S. E. (2013). Mutiny and nonviolence in the Arab Spring: Exploring military defections and loyalty in Egypt, Bahrain, and Syria. Journal of Peace Research, 50(3), 337-349. doi:10.1177/0022343313476529
Nepstad, S. E. (2015). Nonviolent Resistance Research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(4), 415-426. doi:10.17813/1086-671X-20-4-415
Onuch, O. (2015). EuroMaidan Protests in Ukraine: Social Media Versus Social Networks. Problems of Post-Communism, 62(4), 217-235. doi:10.1080/10758216.2015.1037676
Opp, K.-D., Roehl, W. (1990). Repression, Micomobilization, and Political Protest. Social Forces, 69, 521-547.
Osa, M., Schock, K. (2007). A Long, Hard Slog: Political Opportunities, Social Networks and the Mobilization of Dissent in Non-Democracies. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 27, 123-153.
Petrova, T. (2018). Diffusion Brokers and Regime Change Waves: The US Role in The Wave of Central and Eastern European Electoral Breakthroughs. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 26(2), 227-250.
Schedler, A. (2010). Authoritarianism’s Last Line of Defense. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 69-80. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0137
Schock, K. (2005). Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements In Nondemocracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schock, K. (2007). Social Movements, Nonviolent. W: G. Ritzer (red.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (s. 4458-4463). Oxford: Blackwell.
Schock, K. (2013). The practice and study of civil resistance. Journal of Peace Research, 50(3), 277-290. doi:10.1177/0022343313476530
Sharp, G. (1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action. Vol. 3: The Dynamics of Nonviolent Action. Boston, Mass.: Porter Sargent Publishers.
Sharp, G. (2003). There are Realistic Alternatives. Boston, Mass.: Albert Einstein Institution.
Shultziner, D. (2018). Transformative Events, Repression, and Regime Change: Theoretical and Psychological Aspects. W: L. R. Kurtz, L. A. Smithey (red.), The Paradox of Repression and Nonviolent Movements (s. 52-73). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Silitski, V. (2009). Tools of Autocracy. Journal of Democracy, 20(2), 42-46. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0067
Smithey, L., Kurtz, L. R. (1999). »We Have Bare Hands«: Nonviolent Social Movements in the Soviet Bloc. W: S. Zunes, L. R. Kurtz, B. A. Sarah (red.), Nonviolent Social Movements: A Geographical Perspective (s. 96-124). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Smithey, L. A., Kurtz, L. R. (2018a). “Smart” Repression. W: L. R. Kurtz, L. A. Smithey (red.), The Paradox of Repression and Nonviolent Movements (s. 185-214). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Smithey, L. A., Kurtz, L. R. (2018b). Introduction: Nonviolent Strategy and Repression Management. W: L. R. Kurtz, L. A. Smithey (red.), The Paradox of Repression and Nonviolent Movements (s. 1-25). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Stephan, M. J., Chenoweth, E. (2008). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. International Security, 33(1), 7-44. doi:10.1162/isec.2008.33.1.7
Sutton, J., Butcher, C. R., Svensson, I. (2014). Explaining political jiu-jitsu: Institution-building and the outcomes of regime violence against unarmed protests. Journal of Peace Research, 51(5), 559-573. doi:10.1177/0022343314531004
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, S. (1996). States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. W: D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, M. N. Zald (red.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (s. 41-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C., Tarrow, S. G. (2015). Contentious Politics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press. Pobrane z https://www.amazon.com/Twitter-Tear-Gas-Fragility-Networked/dp/0300215126
Way, L. A., Levitsky, S. (2006). The dynamics of autocratic coercion after the Cold War. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(3), 387-410. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2006.07.001
Data publikacji: 2020-07-03 01:39:53
Data złożenia artykułu: 2020-06-28 13:05:49
Statystyki
Wskaźniki
Odwołania zewnętrzne
- Brak odwołań zewnętrznych
Prawa autorskie (c) 2020 Jarosław Chodak
Powyższa praca jest udostępniana na lcencji Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.